Nassau Notebook: Precinct Restructuring, Isles to Play in Brooklyn
A weekly look-in at the news of Nassau County.
Nassau Restructures Police Precincts
In an effort to cut back on spending, Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano and Police Commissioner Thomas Dale announced Monday that four of the county's eight police precincts will be restructured.
Four precincts will remain intact while the remaining four will be transformed into new Community Policing Centers, Mangano said.
Click here for more information on the restructuring.
Auxiliary Police Officers Needed
The Nassau County Auxiliary Police is looking for residents to volunteer and serve as members of the Auxiliary Police. The Auxiliary Police are volunteers dedicated to making their community a safe place to live. Members patrol in marked cars equipped with a two-way radio and emergency equipment.
Auxiliary Police Officers patrol seven days per week in our community in addition to assisting the Nassau Police (NCPD) with crowd control and traffic at community events. Another function of the Auxiliary Police is to assist the NCPD at any disaster scene or during any countywide emergency.
Applicants must be between 18-55, a Nassau County resident, a U.S. citizen and have a high school diploma or G.E.D. All applicants must also have a valid New York State drivers license. A 29-session training course held at the Nassau County Police Academy must be completed. For additional information, please call 573-8830 or email recruit@pdcnaux.org.
Islanders to Play Preseason Game in Brooklyn
The New York Islanders can't escape their dilapidated Long Island home until 2015, but the National Hockey League team will play a preseason game at the Barclays Center this October.
The Isles said on Tuesday that they will play the first hockey game ever at the new building when they take on the New Jersey Devils on Oct. 2 at 7:30 p.m.
Hempstead Village Awarded $1.2 Million for Downtown Revitalization
Mangano announced Tuesday the allocation of a nearly $1.2 million Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) to the Village of Hempstead – the largest grant made to any incorporated Village in this year. The grant will fund a variety of projects in the Village, including improvements to streets and sidewalks in both the downtown business district and residential neighborhoods.
The CDBG will also help fund a variety of after school programs, including the Hempstead PAL recreational activities, PeeWee Football/Cheerleading Program, At-Risk Youth Basketball Program, and the EOC Soccer program. The allocation also includes funds for the Village’s Safe Routes to School program, a New York State Department of Transportation initiative that enables and encourages children to adapt to healthy and active lifestyles by promoting transportation alternatives and implementing projects that improve traffic safety.
Foster Care Audit Recoups More Than $50,000
Nassau County Comptroller George Maragos released a Department of Social Services Foster Care Payments audit which found 76 duplicate or overlapping payments totaling $78,334 and led to the recovery of $52,475. The audit reviewed payments from January 2008 through December 2009 during which 15,000 claims were processed.
In one case, a service provider reported a child as being present in two facilities for the same time period for the purposes of billing. As of the end of 2011, DSS had implemented many of the comptroller’s recommendations and reduced the number of errors even further.
Nassau County Auxiliary Police Executive Board Elected
Inspector Neal Rosenblatt, Commanding Officer of Nassau County Auxiliary Police Unit 116 -- which serves the Fifth Precinct with the exception of the Valley Stream and Elmont -- was reelected at the January 2012 executive board meeting held at the Nassau County Public Safety Center in Westbury. It is Rosenblatt's second term as chairman of the Nassau County Auxiliary Police Executive Board.
The executive board oversees the daily operations of the Auxiliary Police Program in Nassau County in conjunction with the NCPD. Other members serving on the board for 2012 are:
- Vice Chairman; Lt. Kevin Meller of Syosset
- Treasurer; Inspector Joanne Edling of Farmingdale
- Secretary; Deputy Inspector Michael Bier of Hicksville
- Lt. Raymond Montalvo of South Hempstead
- Inspector Michael Spae of Mineola
- Deputy Inspector Diane Laukaitus of Lynbrook
- Lt. Thomas Field of Levittown
Malverne Mel Gives Nassau Residents Six More Weeks of Winter
Malverne Mel made his Groundhog Day forecast for Nassau County residents Thursday morning at 7 a.m. at Reese Park. Click here for Patch's video exclusive.
Lloyd
9:08 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
"The New York Islanders can't escape their dilapidated building"?
How about adding how the NY Islanders cant escape the basement of the NHL'S Atlantic Division?
And how abiut showing Charlie Wang's dismral record as an owner?
Their building isnt their problem, their ownrship is.
And us taxpayers will not fork over a dime for a new arena for his dilapidated team until he's gone.
Timmy B.
10:07 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
We definately need a new arena.. and Wang must go.. but I also think we need to do something to keep the Islanders on Long Island!!! Too many people want a hand in planning the new Coliseum and it has gone no where for years.. I hope they stop bickering and agree finally.. because none will get my vote or donation !
Dave Kloven
10:21 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
this is terrible news... my taxes wont go down ( they never do) but I'll have less services. I dont like paying high taxes, but that life on Long Island. This restructuring will simple freeze my taxes for a year or 2 , but cut police services, which have already been cut. NCPD was once 4200 members strong, it is now 2100.. NC cant not afford to be weak in crime fighting. Having 1 NCPD detective sqd on the southshore and 1 on the northshore is a disgrace and a slap in the face to the residents.. The population is growing and changing ( not for the better) and now is not the time to put a price tag on crime.. Historically across the Nation, nothing has brought down property values faster than an increase in crime... Sure save a 100 bucks on nexts years NC tax, but over time , you will lose 10's of thousands in property value....
Norm Misrok
11:53 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
The main problem facing the situation of keeping the Islanders in Nassau County is not the owner, is not the building, nor is it the team, which happens to be going in the right direction under Garth Snow. Yes, Mr. Wang did error along the way, ie., signing Rick Dipietro to a 15 year contract and for allowing Mike Milbury to destroy this team, but he must be commended for put his money where his mouth is. The finger must be pointed at the Town of Hempstead governing body and Nassau County's governing body, meaning Kate Murray and Ed Mangano. If they cannot get it together, the Islanders will move. As a life time Islanders fan and a season ticket holder, Ms. Murray and Mr. Mangano will be remembered with Walter O'Malley, Charles Stoneham, Robert Moses, Robert Wagner, Norm Green (see Minnesota North Stars) and Robert Irsay (Baltimore Colts), in moving or letting their franchises move. The Islanders are an important part of Nassau County's tapestry and must remain there. The Coliseum is old, but has plenty of personality, and the best sight lines in the NHL. There is not a bad seat in the building. The best compromise would be a total refurbishment of the Coliseum. It would be cost effective and attract major acts, along with my Islanders, to perform. The people of the county need to wake up and see that the Coliseum is necessary and realize the amount of money that will disappear if the building disappears.
Mr Dunes
1:29 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Wang certainly did put his money where his mouth was. Not only seeking to develop a brand new Arena, but also adjacent to the new arena the largest state of the art Athletic Center on the East Coast. Floors filled with Physical Therapists, specialists, this could have been a miraculous gift to the struggling college graduates (Who have Physical /medicine Therapy as a focus) who need jobs and Can't find any. The organizations would have needed managers.
With fellow Nassau County neighbors I sat in the hearing and I listened to That lying Kate Murray Demonize The Proposal's Integrity, because even though unsightly smokestacks that fart smoke into the skies are twice as tall as his proposed office buildings with a connecting bridge. The office buildings were designed by highly professional architects to breath aesthetics into the sight with smooth glass lines, Completely different from the smoke stacks Kate Murray continued to equate to Charles Wang's multi million dollar building.
She stubbornly resisted the gift of investment into this county, & I can't forgive her for that.
If the Coliseum isn't rebuilt/renovated, it's not just a loss to Islanders Fans, but it's a loss to those who have received quality entertainment from that site, & want to continue seeing entertainment.
Once Mangano was voted in, and Murray had this Mangano contingent she dissolved the Wang offer to invest Billions into a hub.
The core of sustaining Nassau should be fixing sewage, anyways.
Marilyn
7:30 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
I agree with you 100% Norm. I have lived in Nassau County since I was born..I watched that Coliseum being built..watched the Islanders win 3 Stanley cups in a row..and watched some of the best musical performances that money can buy. If renovation & repair is not made to that building, there will be no Islanders there, there will be no musical acts, no other shows, & that building will just sit & rot away!
Lloyd
12:16 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I agree totally that Coliseum needs to be renovated and modernized, just like MSG, but NOT torn down.
Don't blame the politicians or the taxpayers, blame Wang, Milbury and their inept, crooked, and selfish ways.
We are NOT going to hand over to Wang our hard earned money so he can make more billions in insider real estate deals.
We all know Wang has a checkered past, running and ruining Computer Associates, so until he's outta here, he's not getting rewarded with MY money or any other non Islanders fan's money...and that(s a big majority of voters.
Mac
7:22 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Lloyd can you please tell us how Wang and Milbury are crooked and selfish when it comes to the Islanders? Also what was wang guilty of with CA? I will give you the ineptness of Milbury hands down one of if not the worst move by Wang ever. Wang has continually supported this team finincially trying to sign players and losing money every year. It has been well documented that players do not want to come here and play in the NVMC. In fact it was voted as the worst arena in hockey by the players. Something needs to be done or there will be no Islanders here on LI and we will all pay more taxes to watch the 77 acres turn into a weed infested area.
PADD
1:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
They are not laying off police officers, they are consolidaing structures. Does it matter where the officer brings his report? The police officers turn out of the back of their personal cars that are parked near police booths, shopping centers or fire houses. They will still be patrolling the same sectors that they patrol now. Actually there will be more officers on the streets, as those who currently sitting at desk jobs (on full duty) will go out on patrol. Not many residents visit the precincts other then to pick up a report. That may be the biggest drawback. If the PBA or the SOC had made concessions or deferred raises for a period of time maybe some of the structures could have been saved. There were no layoffs of uniformed personnel so be grateful for that.
Mary McKab
4:05 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Hey PADD, for the last 3 years, the PBA and SOA were in a bail out plan with the county giving them 50 million dollars. They didn't have to do it, but they did. Newsday always fails to report that. Every year the county comes to the unions with their hat in their hands asking the them to open a closed contract and every time, they do. Now, no matter what Mr. Carver comes up with, it's always not enough. Remember, a lot of our police officers live in the county and have as much of a vested interest in the county as we do.
Oh, and Mr. Mangano said that he was going to be holding hearings and community meetings to let everyone know what this whole idea was about, well, he lied. There is going to be a special session on Monday to pass this crappy idea. Why is he working so hard to get this done fast? Kinda like the Health Care Bill. We have to pass it to know what's in it. This is a bad idea and will be the downfall of this administration.
Timmy B.
4:23 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I blame a number of people.. Mangano and Kate Murray are top of the list.. none will be getting our votes to a large amount of people in our neighborhood..
ed
5:31 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Mangano and Peter Schmitt are destroying Nassau County! DUMP the Nassau Republicans and we need an independent investigation into their corruption!
ROBERT
5:58 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Mangano's decision to close four Nassau County Police Precinct's is another bad decision from this administration. Each precinct covers a few towns currently , these precincts have Commanding Officers that see over the problems of these areas. There are many things that go on in the precincts that the public does not see, from managing crime stat's and putting into place solutions to combat these crimes ,setting up for large events were police are needed and dealing with smaller issues within the communities . Mangano is now going to put the work load of two precincts into one . So now a Commanding Officer who was in charge of 3 to 5 towns is going to be in charge of 6 to 10 towns. Less staff and less precincts equals less attention from the Police Department to the communities they cover. Ed Mangano is ruining this county. His past ideas have all failed and he's focused on putting the counties problems on the backs of the workers. Do you think Ed Mangano would eliminate a few legislative positions and have the remaining legislator's cover more towns? That would save the county money! When it comes to policing if you remove precinct's and their staff you put the public's safety in jeopardy . The residents should stop Ed Mangano from going ahead with his plan one that will effect the quality of life in Nassau County.
Marilyn
7:33 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Agreed!
ROBERT
6:05 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
If your against this decision look up your local legislator online and send them an e-mail voicing your opinion to this bad decision. It takes 5 minutes of your time. The county is currently trying to circumvent legislative rules by not haveing public hearings before this goes to vote. Recent newsday poll shows 75% of the votes are against the closing of Police Pcts
ROBERT
6:09 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
These new so called community police centers are a joke. Keeping 2 Police officers in them 24 hrs to hand out accident reports. This is a bad decision . There are not large rooms in these pcts to hold public meetings also. Taxes will remain the same but your Police Dept is being ripped apart.
Soup Nazi
7:23 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I am open minded about the precinct closing and would listen to bith sides. At first look I have to say that any plan that puts more uniforms into the patrol cars ( where they should be ) is a good idea. I would venture to bet that 99 percent of all county residents have never been to their stationhouse. Mine is over 4 miles away in Seaford. I would think that taking all the people in admin positions and either firing them ( if they are civilian ) or putting them on patrol would be a good thing. Every company and goverment agency in the country is looking to cut waste. Every level of govt wastes so much of our money, nassau being the same, A police dept has to operate like an army of a fire department. They need to constantly shift personal and tactics to face a changing world. Just because something has been done a certain way does not make it right. If the union is lookng to protect jobs than that is wrong. If Mangano is acting in good faith and meets with each county legislator to explain it, than he should get his way. if you think this is bad please explian how it is going to impact my safety.
Simba
8:55 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Dan
The question is, Is Mangano a crime prevention specialist ? Does he have ample experience directing a Police Department in reducing crime ? Chances are the answer is NO. So his decision is not based on keeping you and me safe because he doesn't have any experience to do so. His new Police Commissioner is someone he hired, do you think he is going to speak up about this, and endanger his paycheck. So what do we have here is a Political solution to a crime problem. Do you have any faith that that is what we need to reduce crime. Not me. You may not be aware that since 9/11 Federal Law Enforcement has concentrated the majority of it's resources in Counterterrorism. Greatly reducing it's work in gangs and violent crimes, pushing back this work onto the local PD. Your local PD is trying to do more without Federal support. So does any reduction make any sense.
Harvey Goodhart
11:27 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Dan, with all due respect I am in total disagreement with you. And enough with the highly paid cops. As far as I am concerned there is no such thing as a highly paid cop, but there are thousands of cops who aren't paid enough. I don't know when you retired but all of this world got alot more dangerous since 9/11. I don't know of any city precinct with just two cops on duty on the midnight. I realize you are willing to take a chance with the citizens of Nassau County's safety, I am not. I do agree there is alot of waste in Government but the sfety of our citizens must be the #1 priority. You know there are alot of radicals who over the years has called the NYPD as an occupying army, I guess you agree with that. By the way, I was only a first generation cop who was a little higher rank than you. I was a crime fighting cop for 90 percent of my career retiring from the SCU where I worked with the best and most courageous cops I have ever known. No disrespect intended for ESU cops.
Eddie
8:43 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I think 95% of Nassau welcomes the tax savings and is glad to see someone finally do something to save the taxpayers money!
paul
9:11 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
To Eddie:
There are a lot of stories in this column.
Which one are you referring to?
Dave Kloven
8:35 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Your taxes are going to be just as high, but now we lose the service... Our property value will be the 1st to feel this mistake.
ROBERT
9:30 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
If you read my orginal posts I explained the functions of the station houses . The Nassau County Police dept is at its lowest levels. At one time the force was 4200 strong its down to a force of around 2100 currently. All special patrols have been cut or done away with. Officers who staff pcts are responsible for many functions that deal with the patrol division. Go to your local pct and you will see they are very busy sometimes 24 hrs a day. Just because you haven't been to your local pct doesn't mean other people don't go either. The Police stations are a necessary tool in the Police dept. Ask the new Police Commissioner how many pct's they closed in the city while he was there. I can tell you NONE. Less police pcts and less staff equal less police attention to the communities they serve. The residents of Nassau County deserve the best Police protection Ed Mangano is going to change that with his bad ideas.
Dave Kloven
8:46 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
This plan is a criminals dream..... You think its bad for property value when the school district turns south? This is a nightmare ! Brooklyn and Queens are knocking at our door, and guess what? The NYPD is more efficient and affective then ever... This is why you have already seen areas like Valley Stream, Elmont, Baldwin, Freeport, Hempstead, Uniondale, Roosevelt and Lakeview experiencing crime rates on the rise.
Simba
12:40 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Excellent post, NC is becoming an easy playground for gangs and criminals.
Soup Nazi
8:46 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Robert
Police stations in the city, particularly the ones in bad neighborhoods are the center of the precinct. They are also their for roll calls. For those who dont know. In the city the cops stand a roll call before the shift to get their assigment and training. The radio cars are kept at the precinct. In Nassau the policman starts his tour in the field, where there have those little relief areas with those little building. The cops does not have to go to the stationhouse. Arent we also looking at eliminating civilian positions like time records, roll call people, cleaners etc.
Robert... I am not against the cops. I strongly believe that the PC should have control over his troops. If a company CEO decides tomorrow to move the company to another town, do the workers cry and sue. No. They make the move. I expect our govt employees to listen to their bosses and act like professional. Let the public decide this at the next election. I believe this was an issue last time, and the public by a slim margin stayed the course.
Dave Kloven
1:01 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
They are not CEOs. This is not a PRIVATE industry! This is public service. It isn't about what the cops want, it's about serving Nassau County Residents! The residents of Nassau would not have a leg to stand on if a CEO wanted to move a private business, it doesn't impact the our services as taxpayers. You can not compare the two. Maybe that's the problem! CEOs care about their company and ONLY their company. The publics interest is not considered in private industry.
Soup Nazi
8:52 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
David....it may be a criminals dream....tell me why. yes I see crime increasing in some of the neighborhoods. We want to know how this program will either help or hurt.
maria
1:41 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
hey dan...i invite you to sit through a midnight in the 5th pct. or the 1st pct. etc... and then report back on how not busy they are...just because you don't go doesn't mean people aren't in and out all night...also dealing with all kinds of calls and helping the officers on duty with arrests etc....go have a look...isn't it obvious why mangano is doing this given the state of affairs with the police....it's because he can't get his way with the contracts etc....so he's gonna try another way to mess with police....this wasn't a revelation to help police and citizens....wake up dan and be a brother in blue....i know it's hard for city cops to do being they can get so jealous etc....but try
Harvey Goodhart
8:55 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Dan, I guess you would admit that you don't know the first about Policing. #1 No, a Police department does not operate like an army, # 2 the most basic function of any union is to protect jobs, that is not wrong. Read Robert's posts on this site, he knows what he is talking about. Yes, most people will never step into a Police Pct, but that it is a good thing. Two cops on duty, that is a very dangerous idea. While some Politicians act in good faith, most do not understand anything about Policing. Joe Scanell is is one that fully understands. Also for way over a hundred years there have been Pcts. in every city in our country, this idea about community meetings is just plain dumb. But if they have ping pong or shuffleboard, it might serve a purpose. Just putting cops in radio cars is far from a good idea, there is ALOT MORE about policing than that. I am very concerned about my families and other families safety, and of course yours. Mangano is concerned about spending, he can say what ever he wants but I guarantee you the people of Nassau County will be less safe. If you rather save a few bucks, which probably won't happen anyway, support his plan. But remember this, most politicians have no experience with policing although they talk a good game. Police Commissions must go along with them or they would be out of a job. Have a good day and kiss your kids when sending them off to school, they are the ones that are important.
Soup Nazi
6:53 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
2 cops inside the stationhouse....how many do we need LOL.... I got a gun a radio and big stick....where are their stationhouses Iraq ?
paul
6:16 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
To Harvey:
Do I know you?
Soup Nazi
9:08 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Harvey,,,,Thanks for telling me about policing, I guess being a third generation cop and a retired Lieutenant from the NYPD ( every minute of it on patrol) didnt teach me anything. Two cops on duty in the SH sounds dangerous.. lol.. really how many grown men and woman do we need. Even in the city there are only two cops inside the stationhuse during the overnight. My point is that I dont want to see highly paid cops protesting and the nassau having to spend money in court. Just let it happen and let the next election decide the issue.
Dave Kloven
1:09 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
What NYPD pct has 2 cops inside? You were never a cop, this is obvious. Nice try. Even the slowest NYPD pcts have a minimum of 4-5 cops inside at anytime. On a side note, when a pct gets too busy the city divided the area and formed another pct. an example is when the 79-81 pcts were formed or when the 77 pct was too busy, the 78 gained area to patrol. How about when they formed the housing police? They put the pcts in the busiest projects they could find. Nassau is getting busier and consolidating its areas. This is a major no no as far as Police science is concerned.
Soup Nazi
4:51 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Dave, I was a desk lieutenant in the bronx on the overnight. There was me on the desk, and a cop on the switchboard. A couple of civilians in the clerical romm doing the paperwork. Guy came in and out for various reasons ( gas, personal, meal ) but there wasne tanyone else assigned to the house.
Again my main point is that the pc MUST have the right to move his troops around as he sees fit to deal with the issues. One of the issues is the budget. We would love a "cop every block", but that aint gonna happen. The unions are representing their members and that fine. I expect that and thats cool. They did a great job representing the auto workers too, right until the day they all went out of business. I expect my officers and other govt employees to do their job, and then let the taxpayers decide if they like the plan. That happens on election day.
Marilyn
6:16 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Why is a comparison being made between the NYPD & the NCPD?? There are still many more precincts in the NYPD then in Nassau County. No one is asking for a cop on every block...all we are asking for is to keep the 4 precincts that are destined to become "community policing centers" as police fully functioning precincts. If Nassau County needs to save money, how about cutting the salaries & pension plans of the people like Mangano who come up with these ludicrous ideas! And how about hiring back some of the civil service employees that were put out of work & have them make collection calls to the deadbeats that don't pay their tickets!!! The bottom line is that if the 4 police precincts aren't there anymore, Nassau County will become an unsafe place to live...see what that does to your property values!
ROBERT
9:51 pm on Sunday, February 5, 2012
Dan Nap closing the Station Houses in Nassau County is a bad idea. If you were a City Lt you would know that. The city never looks to close pcts because they know its the wrong thing to do. The NC police officers relieve at relieving points around the County because each pct covers large areas. To have the officers to come into the pct to stand roll could not be done because of the size of the pcts. If the police relieved at the station house there would be no cops on the street. The city can do this because pcts cover much smaller areas. The 8 pcts are there for a reason . 8 pcts to cover all of Nassau County is reasonable and the communities deserve it . Years ago there talks about adding a 9th pct in the higher crime areas of NC. In the long run this bad decision will not save the County money but cost them. I saw your face book posts, look at your tax receipt more than 60% goes to school tax. The school tax is out of control. These wonderful politicians in New York State need to correct the school districts on Long Island.
Soup Nazi
6:45 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Rob. yes most of the tax goes to school. Every of goverment whether the cops, schools, water districts are subject to review . I am not blaming the cops, the teachers, or anyone for this mess. it was a long time in the making .
Lloyd
8:18 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
By the obvious lack of postings regarding the Islanders, it shows how little interest there really is in the fate of that team. So when the taxpayers again refuse to spend for a new arena, its only because there is little support in keeping that losing team and ownership here on Long Island.
Simba
10:42 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Lloyd
Big Islander fan here, but with the choice of either spending 500 on an oil bill or supporting a rich millionare, I'll spend it on my oil bill. Wang would make more friends if just built a new arena on the same grounds as NC. He would get much more support, instead of wanting a huge complex, which would be nice but in today's world not practical.
Mac
10:47 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
I dont think that the Islanders arent important but the police precinct situation is a little more pressing to most.
Also-Simba Wang cannot build a new arena because the county will not sell him the land! they wanted him to pay for the building then NOT own it. The coliseum is a big mess having nothing to do with the ISlanders or Wang. In reality its about the two political parties not agreeing.
James M.
5:28 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
RIght to build but not own is a normal tactic of the gov't. THere is usually a transfer of 20 years occupation rights for the building being built. it is common practice. Wang was allowed to rebuild the Colosseum but he refused unless he could build the rest of the Real Estate to make 10x his investment. Once the Lighthouse Project was off the table he started this "the public needs to pay for a new Colosseum or we leave". Well Wang can't move the Islanders without consent from the NHL but he may be able to be forced to sell by the NHL. Wang is refusing to make necessary repairs to the NC unless the County reimburses him but he wants the county reimburse him for cosmetic changes as well.
Lloyd
10:12 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
Any Islanders fans out there??
Heres a great idea to salvage your sinking franchise and get a new arena built at the same time...
GET THE MARA FAMILY TO BUY THE ISLANDERS.
paul
8:33 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
To Lloyd:
Dumb idea. I like the Mara family........
ROBERT
4:26 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
A plan for private investors to build a new coliseum or update the current coliseum, I think is the best solution.
Business Man
5:08 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Funny how Wang won the developmenmt rights in a public bid. Corrupt Kate refused to meet with him & negotiate a scaled down Lighthouse, claiming "conflict of interest". Now the "Better LI" Group wants to bid on the rights after 2015 and she is willing to sit down & negotiate with them?? They have not even won the rights yet. Please explain, Ms. Murray???
James M.
5:40 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Kate Murray was only willing to approve a new coliseum and Wang wanted to build Wang Town. Kate refused to negotiate Wang Town without Wang putting money in to pay for the infastructure changes required by Wang Town. Wang refused to put money in for infastructure changes and Kate Murray refused to negotiate further.
THe new group as far as I know just wants to put up a new coliseum.
John Rennhack
6:06 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
James, Wang came back to the table over and over willing to address traffic and environmental concerns. Murray did not want so many more people moving into an area that would most definetly change the current voting pattern. Political considerations trumped everything else. Wang had $50million for traffic mitigation alone. And another $5million for other projects that might pop up.
Business Man
9:24 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
James-simple facts:
Wang wanted to sit down with Ms. Murray to negotiate a solution. Wheher they would have came away with an agreement or not, we will never know. Maybe, or maybe not, as you seem to think. If Wang would not budge, then you would be correct. We will never know. Ms. Murray REFUSED to sit down & negotiate, claiming "conflict of interest". This despite the fact that Wang\Rechler had won development rights in a public bid. Now another group wants to bid on the rights and she is willing to sit down with them?
James M.
1:25 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Here are Murray's Responses to the lighthouse project
http://www.lettherebelighthouse.com/2010/07/kate-murrays-lighthouse-scale-down.html
http://www.longislandpress.com/2010/06/28/prospects-flicker-for-lighthouse-project/
http://www.liherald.com/stories/Zoning-move-cuts-Lighthouse-in-half,26353
http://www.longislandpress.com/2011/07/28/ed-mangano-charles-wang-plan-to-rebuild-nassau-coliseum/
Each of these refute your assessments of the situation. If Wang had agreed to the scaled down version we wouldn't have this discussion but Wang wanted to make BILLIONS off this deal instead of Millions. The Town would have been more Republican under Wang's proposal since many of the residents would be middle and upper class people.
Mac
1:39 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
James Marshall did you read the article? The article comments that the scaled down plan is bad for the owner and bad for the county...a second rate development. This was all public knowledge years ago so what point are you trying to prove? Kate wanted to have it her way. remember at this point in time the county exec was a democrat. Funny how Kate backed the vote of our money when backed by republicans but didnt back the project when funded with private money. Please tell us how the article refutes anything?
James M.
2:50 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
What's the point Mac you aren't going to listen. You read half of one article and discarded the rest as irrelevant because it didn't match your point of view.
Mr Dunes
7:40 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Wang dedicated funds also for water dept. improvements as well. You hit the nail right on the head John. "Murray did not want so many more people moving into an area that would most definitely change the current voting pattern." With so many job opportunities in the the state of the art Athletics facility in the Lighthouse plan, there would have been jobs for new college graduates, and affordable housing on site for the young residents, and neighbors.
Future Generations Can't afford to have Murray's Perverse agenda ahead of Pragmatic governance.
Business Man
12:26 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
James, you keep missing the point:
Ms. Murray REFUSED to SIT DOWN with the Wang group to try to negotiate an agreement. Here you had a group that won a public RFP to develop. They were ready to spend a fortune to develop the area. All they asked for was to be able to make back their investment and yes, make some profit. Do we not all expect that when we invest in something? They scaled down their original proposal and were willing to scale it down some more. Rather than meeting with the Wang Rechler group, Ms. Murray (I did not know that she was a devloper), proposed her own plan on how THEY should spend THEIR money. Again, all he asked was to sit down & negotiate. Again, then and to this day, she refuses to sit down with the people that won the public RFP. If an agreement cannot be worked out in a negotation, then we can decide who is not being reasonable. Until then we are at a very typical, Nassau County political stalemate.
Lloyd
7:41 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
And you guys trust and believe Charles Wang?
And you think the building must be torn down when
MSG is getting a complete facelift and renovation without all the other crap and expense that would add unaffordable and unnecessary millions to the project?
John Rennhack
8:17 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
I trust Wang more than Town of Hempstead or Nassau officials.
paul
8:37 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
To Lloyd:
MSG is a different issue.
You cant just move MSG to another location.......
There is a ton of space to rebuild a new Colisiem in nassau....
Same property different side of the parking lot and we would continue to use the old one until a new one is completed.....
Its that simple.
Yankee, Shea, and Giants did it as well as many others around the country...
Mac
9:00 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
LLoyd yes renovate the Coliseum using the same standards that MSG used. remember that the Dolans own MSG and by the way projected costs for the renovation could surpass 850 million when all is said and done. I guess it makes sense for the County to spend that money because the lesser amount was voted down.
Mr Dunes
9:49 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Loyd, With all due respect. Looking at The Colliseum and at MSG is like looking at apples and oranges. How could they possibly demolish MSG on top of Penn Station? MSG should have been torn down, but the hindsight doesn't help us any. Now I have been in the basement of the colliseum, but I've never been in any boxseats, vip suites, etc.. I know that for modern events substantial space is needed. For Boat Shows (Which are held in the basement, one entrance and one exit is extremely cramping. People like to paint owners as greedy for wanting to build new arenas for more vip suites as their objective, but that isn't the case. Wang wanted an entire State of the Art facility 3-4 Floors with (I sound like a broken record) specialists, equipment for the Athletes of Long Island, and for the Islanders. The Colliseum was going to be able to hold conventions in the actual arena, not in the tight basement.
So the Dolan's took the rational way out to save himself from hundreds of millions of dollars for insurance policies alone with the risk of holding up the commutes of 1,000,000 commuters in the basement of MSG.
I'm not a millionaire who can afford VIP Suites, I don't care if I'll ever be, but I want to be offered a great diversity of jobs for people with exceptional backgrounds, and Kate Murray's resistance showed her true partisan agenda, and not a pragmatic approach to the graduating generation.
Norm Misrok
7:43 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
The politicians who run Nassau County and the Town of Hempstead are the typical politician(s), in regard to smiling at you, kissing the babies and doing what is right for them & not the people. Kate Murray & Ed Mangano are failing the people in every sense of the word. The political parties involved, both Democrat & Republican, should be ashamed of themselves for treating the Islanders, which is a valuable resource in terms of tax revenue and jobs, in the current manner. Yes, Mr. Wang is a businessman who wants to make money, and yes, he may have made some errors in judgement (Lighthouse), but he has put good money into building a team of promise. As I said earlier, it was the politicians who cost NYC the Dodgers and Giants. The last question is...how did Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Winnipeg (near future, but in the books), and Brooklyn, yes people NYC politics aside, get new arenas? Without offending people from those fine areas, how can Nassau County allow those areas to surpass us? The answer is Kate Murray and her cronies who run the Town of Hempstead. They will let the Islanders leave and say that they did everything they could to keep them here. NOT!!!! The simplest thing would be to renovate the Coliseum, but that would present a problem, because the two parties would never agree. Just look at the team histories of the Indianapolis Colts, Dallas Stars and the Baltimore Ravens & that could be the future of the Islanders. Close the Coliseum,lost money,lost jobs.
paul
8:17 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
To Norm:
You asked -
How did Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Winnipeg (near future, but in the books), and Brooklyn, yes people NYC politics aside, get new arenas? Without offending people from those fine areas, how can Nassau County allow those areas to surpass us?
The answer is easy.
Economics 101 my friend...
We are smarter and sharper than those that make the decisions out here...
Norm Misrok
8:00 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Last comment regarding the Islanders: As a lifetime Islanders fan, going back to game three of the 1972 season v Boston, and moving to Nassau County to offer my family a good life, I can tell you without a second thought, that if the Islanders are permitted to move, I will never, never spend another penny for any event that is held in the Coliseum or whatever will be there. I am a diehard KISS fan, and if I am given tickets to sit in the first row center, I would get rid of them. The town had better not drop the ball on this.
paul
8:32 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
To all:
Lets face facts.
The Coliseum is old and unattractive by today's standards and is in need of a lot of work.
I know many of you reading this just think of it as a building for sports and you have no interest in it..
That's OK.
But lets move on a bit...
Let the county partake in some spending so they / we can reap the benefits later on.
Its Economics 101.
Once it is built the county would need to have an ace marketing team in order to book events at the new venue WHEN it is built.
Refurbishing may no longer be an option for the old building.....
Lets build an infrastructure that can and will be used by many corporations and multiple teams.
For a minute forget the Islanders.
I know they are easy to forget..... next....
I think they will be going to their new home in Brooklyn.
It is a win for Brooklyn and a win for most Long Islanders who go to games after work (which are many).
The Long Island railroad is right out the doorstep at the new center in Brooklyn.
Win, win again.
Other teams can be lured into a new arena built by the county.
If the County builds it they also reap the benefits from naming rights, sales etc, from all the venues it will have. (hopefully many)
Lloyd
10:21 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
Pethaps if it was any owner other than Wang, the Town and the public would have cooperated and moved ahead. Way too big a project to sell to the public, and Wang (Mr.Computer Associates), will never win any sympathy around here especially the wsy he's run down the Islanders.
You mentioned other cities which recently built new arenas. Do you mind comparing their property tax rates to ours? p
Wang will pack up and move the Islanders to Brooklyn like the Devils moved to a new arena in Newark.
paul
11:05 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
To Lloyd:
If the Islanders stink that's not Wang's fault he is not on skates.
Look at it this way, originally he wanted to take them out of state.
Put Wang and his money aside.
The county holds all the chips for rebuilding the county infrastructure.
They need to find a private partner, (maybe) yes a partner so both can profit the company and the county....
Lloyd
12:02 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
You have to be kidding, Paul.
Its TOTALLY Wang's fault for their miserable record since he took over. He knows nothing about hockey and it showed by his "love affair" with Mike Milbury and then giving a goalie a "lifetime" contract.
When nearly every NHL team makes the playoffs, how is it possible that the Islanders have missed it for most of the past 10 years?
You have to look at poor management decisions and it starts at the top. Wang is the Wilpon of hockey. He's got to go before I ever buy another ticket or vote to build a new arena for the team.
Mac
6:49 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
LLoyd I cant totally blame Wang. Yes he did hire Milbury and stuck with him and that is where he went wrong. Wang is fighting an uphill battle because players DO NOT want to come here to play. They offered more money to several free agents over the pastthree years and they all said no and signed for less somewhere else. The NVNC was voted the worst arena in hockey by the payers and they took into consideration building, ice surface, locker rooms etc.. Has Wang made poor decisions YES but he continually dumps his own money in the team operating at a loss. I still feel the biggest mistake was getting rid of Laviolette. Also, the bickering between politicians do not make it easy for Wang or any of us.
Lloyd
8:27 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Before Wang took over and when the Islanders were a winning team, they had no triuble attracting good young players.
MSG is as old as the Coliseum. I dont see the Rangers floundering around in the cellar every year. Good players would rather sign with James Dolan than Charles Wang. That tells you something.
So keep blaming the building. If the team and ownership were any good, quality players would run here for the money even if all we had here was an outdoor facility.
One last point...Have you ever heard of Fenway Park?
Why is it that the Sox have been so successful DESPITE playing in the smallest and oldest park in the league? And why do they sell out EVERY single game DESPITE providing no parking, no amenities, and high ticket prices?
zGet back to me when you figure out the anawer.
Mac
9:01 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Ok LLoyd you need to do your homework before you respond. MSG is technically older then the Colisuem but it has been renovoted many times in the last 30 years including the current 850million dollar renovation which is more than the estimated cost for a new coliseum. The Rangers are regardless of record a premier team in the NHL one of the originals. Everyobody wants to play in NY and make the big bucks. Fenway Park is also very interesting and has gone through many renovations in its lifetime including the seats on the green monster. Have you ever been to Fenway? The place is history. You cannot compare any building in any sport with the exception of maybe Wrigley to fenway. Here is your final answer that you need to think about. Who owns MSG ...the Dolans. Who owns Fenway?...John Henry, Larry Luchino and Tom Werner who also own the Red Sox. the owners of the club own the building and get a piece of everything associated such as food, parking, concerts and other events held there. I am not naive to think the coliseum is the only reason players dont come here but it is a large part of the reason. Let Wang build it AND own it then collect parking and vending then you may see a difference. You look at most successful franchises and you will see the owners own the building or have other means in place to make additional money from the building. That is a problem Nassau County doesnt want Wang to own it but build it for them THEN rent it from them.
Business Man
9:37 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Lloyd,
WAY before Wang bought the team, the Islanders were winners. Do you remember Spano, Gluckstern\Millstein? As bad as they look this year, they were much worse back then. How quickly we forget. And yes, no one wanted to be on the team then. Remember Kirk Mueller, hell even Steve Yzerman when there were rumors he could be traded for LaFontaine. He squabbled like a baby.Not like Wang took over the team in 1983.
And you cannot compare Baseball Economics to Hockey's. Totally different. The Sox get a huge chunk from NESN, corporate boxes, team merchandise etc...And yes, the fan base for the Red Sox is and always will be much more supportive than LI will ever be for hockey.
fred
9:21 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I agree with Lloyd. If the Islanders made a commitment to winning, players would come to the Island even if it meant playing at the Commack Arena!!
Joe
10:05 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
The community centers are just one step away from full closure, next year you will hear it's not financially feasible because xyz.
I was just at an Islander came and I don't see an issue with the coliseum myself, sure an upgrade would be better, but that building is not making the Islanders better or worse, its the ownership plain and simple. Wang is a businessman, not a sports owner, just look at his tenure at CA, magically the only one not indicted.
Mac
10:26 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
It is good you have no issue with the colisuem. Where you at the game where they had to move fans in the upper sections because of the roof leaking? Where your seats in good condition or did you sit in one of the bent seats or ones without arms? Billy Joel stated he would never play the coliseum again because it is subpar for performances and he is not the only performer to say so. Unfortunately it isnt about the consumer always but the acts and events who choose not to come there because of the building. It needs to be replaced or a major renovation at the very minimum. It is part of the reason players do not come. I hate to tell you but Wang is a sports owner. What exactly do you mean sports owner anyway? Arent they all businessman to start with. Was marc Cuban a business man, Steinbrenner etc... all of these guys are billiomnaire business owners who own sports teams.
Interested Bystander
10:26 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
The coliseum is a dump plain and simple. Not an islander fan but won't even go there for concerts or the circus. As for the Nassau Police reorganization - not sure why it is a bad thing to get police out from behind a desk and onto the street. Can someone articulate why that is a bad thing ?
An tUasal Airgead
3:57 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
From the NC website
-New Community Policing Centers to Open with 48 POP Cops
-Transforms four current precincts into four new Community Policing Centers.
-reassigns 48 police officers from desk jobs to Problem Oriented Police (POP) positions
-Assigns 48 more police officers to community policing positions.
http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/CountyExecutive/NewsRelease/2012/01
->48 police officers that held desk jobs in the precincts, will now have desk jobs in the same buildings, but they will call the buildings "Community Policing Centers", instead of a "precinct"!?!?
-
-
- Saves taxpayers up to $20 million annually by eliminating 100 desk jobs.
http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/CountyExecutive/NewsRelease/2012/01
“The plan doesn’t call for layoffs,” Krumpter explained, “it calls for natural attrition.” He added that every year around 100 cops leave the Nassau police force through attrition, and that the average cost of a Nassau cop including pension and benefits is $200,000 per year.
http://www.newsday.com/long-island/towns/long-island-now-1.1732330/levittown-residents-question-nassau-police-plan-1.3510970?p=
->If 48 are reassigned to a desk job in the same building (with a new building name) and 100 desk positions are eliminated through attrition, how does that equate to more police on the streets?
Interested Bystander
6:00 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Maybe it doesn't. So I guess the desks of Nassau County will be quaking in their boots. Frankly, it sound like we have WAY too many police inside when we need them outside. Lots of police sitting at desks doesn't really give me the warm and fuzzzies that we're all safe.
maria
6:20 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
oooo interested bystander....1st they complain too many respond to bullcrap calls now they complain too many inside.....blah blah blah....go sit inside a pct. all night...see what they do before you judge....don't take this political crap out on the police...they are the ones risking their lives every single day...they work around they clock...they don't have weekends off...they don't have holidays off....etc....
Mac
4:49 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
James Marshall I read the article and I don't think it paints Kate in a positive way. Her decisions at the time and current decisions are always based on party vs party. The town of Hempstead was rep at the time and the county democrat. Her proposal was nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Please remember the article was two years ago. I honestly do not see how the article proves either point. I will ask again how does that specific article refute anything? The lighthouse project rejection had more to do with politics than anything else. We would all be ignorant to think anything else. This county represents what is worst in party fighting.
paul
6:22 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
In reading all the above about two specific topics I realized a couple of thoughts:
1 - About the coliseum - Most of the comments show me you know nothing about Economics 101, we need to build a modern coliseum.
In order to make money you need to spend money.
2 - The police precinct situation.
You have no idea about policing and what works. The average person commenting thinks nothing gets done in a precinct especially overnight.
You are so wrong.
A lot gets done 24/7 in all the precincts.
maria
6:27 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
i agree about the police thing paul....people should know before they write....the pcts. are often busier then the police in the cars....
Interested Bystander
9:47 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Frankly in this economic environment nothing is sacrosanct. Not Teachers. Cops. Fire fighters. No one. There is a huge fiscal problem that needs to be solved. I'm sure everyone can make a very poignant case about why their job is the most critical crucial vital the world will end without me. But just saying the police didn't cause this problem and therefore should not be part of the solution is myopic and ultimately pointless. They are the biggest part of the budget. They will be part of the solution.
Soup Nazi
9:48 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Maybe we can use the Islanders as policeman when they move away lol. Maria....is it busy inside the stationhouse handing out copies of accident reports.....then hire a police aide at a fraction of the price..... I love my cops.. I love them even more when they are wearing their vest and gunbelt and ready to respond to 9-11 calls... Thats all people are saying.
maria
7:25 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
dan you are so ignorant.....it that what you think the police do inside? i have a loved one inside running the pct. on the midnight shift....the work it takes to run the pct. is a tremendous resposibility....they keep track of every officer in the pct. and every call they are on...the paperwork in insurmountable...and it's their head if things go wrong..they are directing who goes where...if there are guns found at the scene they are doing all the processing etc...etc...etc....again i invite you to go down and see for yourself.....
Lloyd
7:52 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
For all of youse who believe that building a new arena for the Islandets and Billy Joel is the best thing for Long Island.......Just take a good look at whats happening about 20 miles west in Flushing.
The once popular and successful NY Mets have a brand new billion dollar building and the team is LOSING money. In New York, a losing team combined with unpopular, unscrupulous, inept, and shortsighted ownership turns fans away. You can easily compare the Wilpons to Charles Wang.....Omar Minaya to Mike Milbury. These are the most hated men in New York for destroying once popular and sucessful franchises.
They awarded bad contracts to mediocre players and let the really rgood ones walk away.
They made bad draft picks anrd ruined their minor league system. And both teams are now suffering at the gate and in overall popularity. Nobody carrs about them anymore. Its a Yankees and Rangers town.
So a new arena can not help save bad ownership and most Long Island taxpayers will not foot the bill to help these greedy owners and will not pay high ticket prices in a new building to watch a lousy team...Mets OR Islanders.
And if the. Nassau Coliseum is not good enough for an equally old and outdated Billy Joel. let him fork over $500 million of the money WE spent on him to build a new arena.
Mac
8:21 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Llyod are you going to keep trying to find more comparisons that arent valid? Where is the billion dollar arena? It isnt Citifield that came it at a cost of 600million which was less than the actual estimate. It was about the only thing the Mets did right. So what billion dollar stadium are you referring too? Please I beg of you stop throwing out numbers before you speak. Where is the EASY comparison between Wilpon and Wang? The Mets are suffering because they do not have money to put back into the club because of Madoff. I will give you Minaya and Milbury but thats it. AND you are right if the team wins people show up. BUT, even if the Coliseum is a sell out each game Wang operates at even moneyand you can look it up as true. It is the worst lease in professional sports. Who did the Islanders let walk away? Can you name the really good ones that got away? and please dont say Chara or Luongo they both stunk when they were here. The Isles actually have a good AHL team. As far as Billy Joel you really missed the point. Billy was quoted as daying how much he loved playin here and how the Coliseum was like home. If a LI native like Billy Joel will not play here who will?? It no longer attracts the big acts on a regular basis. The equally old and outdated Billy Joel would sell out any and every show he played at the colisuem. Doo a little research because your ignorance is showing.
Lloyd
8:23 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
And its laughable how many of you blame Kate Murray and Ed Mangano instead of Charles Wang.
Thats like Gisele Bundchen blaming the Patriots receivers for their Super Bowl loss.
Wang is solely responsible for the fate of that franchise. Years ago he made his bed and reputation with Computer Associates and his alliance with Mike Milbury. He has no one to blame for his arena and Lighthouse failures but himself.
And we dont have to feel sorry for him. He walked away with over a half billion dollars from CA just before the Federal indictments swooped up all the others there. And he's made a fortune in real estate by gobbling up most of the commercial property up in Oyster Bay.
The only hope left for the Islanders and the Mets is for their ownership to sell out to new people who have the know-how to run a sports franchise in New York.
Mac
8:55 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
What I find laughable are your examples without a shred of backup. To think the local politicians have nothing to do with renovating or replacing a county owned building that has the ability to generate money is once again ignorant. Running a franchise into the ground and county owned property managment are two different items. Kate and Ed have nothing to do with the Islanders performance and that cannot be disputed. However Kate , Ed and the rest of the local politicians have everything to do with why the county cannot move forward on the property. A new owner in the same bad building with the same bad lease will not flourish.
Lloyd
9:37 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Mark my words...The day that Charkes Wang sells the Islanders will be the day the Nassau County taxpayers approve of financing and constructing a new building.
And it IS all about the Islanders and their record under Wangs inept ownership.
Its not kate and Ed's fault, not about Billy Joel or bringing in more Monster Truck competitions and WWE wrestling extravaganzas. Its all about Wang and his reputation, or lack of, with the public.
15,000 Islanders fans cannot force an issue down the throats of a million county residents if we think its too big and expensive a project for us to fund.
Maybe if Wang wasnt going to be involved and benefit from it, we would react very differently.
Mac
9:50 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Lloyd if it isnt about the 15k islander fans can you please enlighten us to why the people of Nassau County hate Charles Wang? Can you please tell us how Charles Wang ruined the actual building? Can you please give us examples of how he is a horrible owner? Can you tell us how much he losses every year? How much he puts back into the team every year? how much he pays for repairs the building? Also tell us what political party sided with Wang durign the lighthouse then what party during the August vote? Once again you rognorance is showing if you truly beilieve the politicians have nothing to do with this. When the Islanders leave and the coliseum shutters its doors who will you blame then?
Business Man
12:35 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
I would venture to say that if the most popular person in the world (PIck anyone), bought the Islanders tomorrow, The voters would overwhelmingly reject any plan to build a new coliseum at public expense. That is why we needed to pursue doing it at Private expense. In order to do that, any investor, has to see a profit at the end of his investment. Capitalism 101.
James M.
2:13 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Lloyd, I agree. Wang made this about him. THe public spoke and said the deal as proposed wasn't sufficient for the public to buy in. If another owner bought the islanders and said he would definitely keep the islanders here and not try to strong arm the public by threatening them with removing the team I think Nassau may be a bit more willing to accept it.
Business Man
5:12 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
There is no way Nassau voters would build a new arena with Public money, no matter who owns the team or how well they are doing. Did you see how lopsided the vote was? Not even close. Exit polls-resounding consensous was-not a penny more for my taxes. Face it, Nassau voters are not "savy" at all, most hardly knew any of the issues involved, all they were worried about was their taxes. The vast majority of times in the US, voters will always vote down almost ANYTHING that will raise their taxes. That is election fact. That is why the only way to build a new arena was with private money. It will never pass any public vote, no matter what.
paul
9:45 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
I cant believe most of the people posting are making it about the Islanders.
It is about yes an arena where the Islanders will be the main event due to its presence.
The Coliseum is about having a venue for 1 or two professional sports teams.
It will additionally be marketed as a venue to host other shows and events to include but not limited to: Disney on Ice, Truck Shows, Boat Shows, area conventions etc.
These are ALL profit making endeavors for the county.
Why doesn't anyone understand economics 101?
Mac
9:51 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Very true Paul. A state of the art facility wil attract much more.
ROBERT
10:05 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Dan Nap if you think a Pct only hands out accident reports you can not be a retired NYC Police Lt. because that statement is so far from the truth. Pcts handled many functions of the dept and the communities they serve. Many inside positions once held by Police Officers have been taken over by civilian positions which is a good thing. It has saved the county money by doing this. Here are some facts on a day tour 7am to 7pm there are approximately 5 Police Officers working inside the pcts to manage the pct functions. On a night tour 7pm to 7am there are 3 Police Officers working inside . Officers working inside handled answering phones (answering complainant questions a Police Officer can answer) , they also handle walk in complainants that could be from a domestic incident to a rape victim , putting out broadcasts over a computer system for a missing child etc. The current Nassau PD is down to its lowest level of 2100 officers , at one time the force was 4200 officers. A Police station is a necessary tool in the police dept and Nassau County needs all 8 pcts it currently has. Don't be fooled by Ed Mangano's new spin of Community Centers. His new puppet Commissioner was embarrassed at the last legislative meeting because he has no clue on whats going on and couldn't answer questions on a department he's in charge of. Ed Mangano's decision to close 4 Pcts a slap in the face to the Nassau County tax payer.
ROBERT
10:16 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Ed Mangano's plan is based on smoke and mirrors and lies.
Lloyd
10:49 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
If you dont like my comparison of the plight of the Islanders vs. the Mets, you can draw an even better comparison between the Islanders and another NY area NHL team.
Why does that other totally ignored and disrespected team make the playoffs every year and compete for the Stanley Cup with "no" fans, no big TV contract, and a very limited budget? How do they keep signing good players, coaches, and develop a winning system with one hand tied around their back?
How did THEY get a new arena and continue to stay solvent playing in a financially depressed, crime ridden city?
What do THEY Have that the Islanders dont?
Is it still all Kate and Ed's fault?
Or do you think that honest and expert ownership/management makes the difference?
Can you say, "Lou Lamoriello"?
Mac
11:08 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
LLoyd once again a comparison made in ignorance. Why did the Devils LEAVE their former arena in fact why are the Nets leaving that same arena? Could it be similar to the coliseum situation? You may want to look it up. The Devils didnt make the playoffs last year so your "every year" comment is as valid as your billion dollar stadium comment. The Devils are on the same plan for a network as the Islanders in case you didnt know. they all fall under that MSG umbrella for broadcasting. Let's see if the Devils sign PArise? It was last year that one of the Devils owners filed for bancruptcy and is still trying to sell his half of the team because they arent making money. Good coaches? How long till Lemaire is back this year? They have about 5 coaches in the last 5 years. The Devils ARE not financially solvent and you can look it up. They are barely hanging on. the new stadium is in debt and still hasnt turned a profit because Newark itself is less than a desirable place to be. Lou is the best GM in sports but having brodeur doesnt hurt. How has Wang been dishonest with this team? AND once again this is about the building. regardless of who owns it the place needs to be renovated or a new one in its place. You continue to give horrible examples that can easily be refuted by a quick google search.
Business Man
11:56 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
If the Islanders were winning cups right now & filling the building every night and if they were owned by the most popular person in the world, I firmly believe Nassau taxpayers still would handily vote down a publically financed arena. That is why it needed to be done with private funds. The only way private funds would work is for a private investor to be able to make back their investment.That's how capitalism works.No one would be interested in building an arena on that land without other immenities to make back their investment. THAT is where Kate was at fault. Instead of meeting with Wang & trying to work out a scaled down Lighthouse, she refused, claiming "conflict of interest". Again, if she met with him and a reasonable solution could not be worked out, then we could decide who was holding up a solution. Since she would not negotiate, the main obsticle to a solution was the TOH. In fairness, the county was fine with the Lighthouse, under both the Suozzi and Mangano administrations.
Interested Bystander
10:50 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
I'm sure that I am not alone in finding name calling and derogatory generalized comments less than useful. Many on this board seem to have a vested interest in keeping the staus quo. Shouting people down because one has no argument may work in NYC public school meetings but then parents there shouldn't complain when Johnny and Sally can't read or write or ultimately get a job, much less go to college. From what I've read in Newsday, the County has done some kind of analysis re: what precincts to close. From what I've read here we need to keep every precinct open 24/7 so that in the middle of the night folks can walk in to get accident reports, to complain about rape or a domestic incident (911 might be a better solution there) and to fill out "insurmountable" paperwork. From my persepctive as a taxpayer, given the County's fiscal mess, that's not enough. Unless the unions or other interested parties show up at the public hearing with more compelling and articulate reasons (not just screaming) as to why the precincts MUST remain open, it seems to me that most residents will agree with the County's analysis. I understand the visceral emotional response by folks who will be impacted by these changes (job description wise or financially etc) but I'm not sure that will be enough to carry the day to maintain the status quo. NIFA won't allow it.
ROBERT
11:45 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Interested bystander with your way of thinking the County should close every Pct . They really don't perform any function except had out accident reports. God help Nassau's crime rate. Guess you haven't read any of my posts
Interested Bystander
1:01 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Actually I have read your posts. From what I've read I think you have some vested interest here. I've lived in Nassau County for more than 25 years. I've never stepped into a precinct in all that time. From what I am reading here, the reasons to keep all 8 precincts open given the economic reality are not compelling. Again, by way of example, if at 3 am someone needs to report a rape or domestic incident - isn't it wiser to call 911? "Insurmountable paperwork" - as a taxpayer do I think we need to pay a Nassau cop $200k all in to complete "insurmountable paperwork." No I do not. With technology and less expensive civilians I think we could and should streamline the paperwork. Make it surmountable. As I've said, I have never even stepped into a precinct. Someone educate me as to what exactly the police officers in that building do over a 12 hour shift that warrants keeping all 8 precincts open. Just saying "god help Nassau's crime rate" doesn't persuade. Facts persuade.
Lloyd
11:48 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Mac...It IS all about Wang and the Islanders.
The public has no interest in helping him out with a new arena due to his very questionable past at the head of CA and his dismal record running the Islanders.
I brought up the Devils because they show what another owner and GM can accomplish working under the same disadvantages as the Islanders.
And look at the Devils past dozen seasons compared to the Islanders. You want to go year by year with me? I challenge you!!
No wonder the Devils get a new arena. They DESERVE it and the taxpayers of Newark and NJ are willing to back them.
And the smart NJ politicians want to ride on a winning bandwagon and show up at victory parades with their Devils, so they grant them concessions to keep the team around. And everyone is happy.
Wang gets what he deserves and no more.
And I have noticed the Islanders seem to be going in the right direction this season with some good young players and smart new contracts.
There has been improvement on the ice and some hope for the future. Maybe it will all translate into a new arena in a few years.
Lloyd
12:10 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
And someone here brought up how Milbury trafed away Roberto Luongo because he played terribly.
Just another Wang/Milbury, apologist.
Luongo was hardly given a chance. And in just 24 games in 1999 he allowed 70 goals....less than 3 per games, then traded to Florida.
Lets talk now about the genius who signed his replacement, goalie DiPietro, to a "lifetime" contract.
He plays SO infrequently, I forgot his first name.
Lloyd
12:26 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
It was you, MAC who wrote that "Luongo and Chara stunk when they were here".
Allowing less than 3 gpg does not "stink", Mac.
And I'm gonna check Brodeur's record in HIS rookie year.
Mac
1:19 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Here is Marty's rookie year "Brodeur gained recognition when he won the Calder Trophy, an annual award for the best rookie in the NHL, after leading the Devils to the second best record in the league and the Eastern Conference Finals". I guess that trumps Luongo. Luongo didnt actually become a top tier goalie until he was ready to leave Florida and look at the long deal he has now. Chara also went on to Ottawo before he became what he is today. DP was the only name player the Isles had at the time. Has he stayed healthy that contract would look like a bargain today. Go do your research about the "the rock" and get back to us. The new building did not equal cups. Also Newark didnt back the plan. the Giv at the time Whitman pushed for it as a way to revitalize Newark and it is still not quite there. Then you say NJ backed them. How so? Are the Devils at the top regarding attendance/ You may want to look that up also. Actually NY state backed the Sabres and gave them loans and bonds for their new stadium yet afforded nothing here when asked. Why doesnt Wang deserve anything? Please tell me one thing he has ever done to hurt a NC or TOH taxpayer? You think he is the only billionaire businessman who bought a sports franchise that had some shady business dealings? Come on your ignorance is showing again. I beg of you research before you post.
Business Man
12:46 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Milbury was an idiot (Wang did not hire him, but inherited him).
Chara, Spezza are actually better examples of stupidity than DiPietro. His injuries could not really be forseen. If he turned out even a little better than average, & Wang did not resign him you all would have been screaming at that. Unfortunately, I think DiPietro drove a hard deal. Either they would have to sign him long term, or shorter term at bigger money, or he would have walked. Sure, as it turned out, we all wish he had walked, but no one could forsee that at the time.
James M.
4:07 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Actually the entire NHL laughed when they signed Dipietro to a 15 year contract.
Here are the reported injuries during his NHL career before the contract was signed.
Oct. 14, 2005: Mild concussion vs. Philadelphia, missed one game.
Oct. 29, 2005: Sprained knee vs. Buffalo, missed one game.
Dec. 30, 2005: Mild knee sprain vs. Ottawa.
Mac
4:41 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
James 3 injuries over a span of 110 games started is bad? Remember also that the year he signed those next three years he started 188 games with a GAA under 3.00. His contract actually started the trend of all tghese long signings we see today.
Lloyd people care about all those things just not enough people. thsi isnt about th eIslanders but the building. Instead of that building generating money for NC it instead costs us money. Wait till the shows leave and people have to travel int the garden for everything but second rate concerts at the beach or in westbury. Wang isnt strong arming anyone just spelling out what will happen. No good businessman will ever buy the Islanders with the existing building, lease especially when the vending and parking is not making him any money. Lloyd you obviously hate Wang and see nothing wrong with the way the politicians handled this parcel. This should have been resolved a long time ago. watch your taxes go up when the coliseum shutters its doors.
James M.
5:33 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
This is the Comptroller report. It actually says the County would be fine without the Islanders (page 9 of 16).
http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/Comptroller/NewsRelease/2011/documents/NVMC-Review_of_Proposed_Redevelopment_FINAL.pdf
Lloyd
2:10 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
It all boils down to many years of Islanders failure for many reasons. Their many loyal fans have been very patient but unless you can turn the clock back to the glory days of the 1980's, the general public has lost interest in helping out the owner and his team. And most people are not worried about Monster Truck Shows, Pet Expos, Disney on Ice, American Idol, and Steel Cage Wrestling matches shunning the Colieum in favor of Westbury or Jones Beach.
Let Wang threaten to move the Isles to Brooklyn or Kansas City. Us taxpayers will fund a new arena when we can afford it and when NIFA OK's it, not when Wang demands it.
Business Man
9:22 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James,
Easy to say "entire league laughed when Isles signed DP". Who exactly laughed?
Name someone specifically? All gossip. 2 Minor sprains and 1 concussion do not constitute an injury risk, sorry. It happened, but again, he drove a hard bargain and if he turned out even somewhat better than average & walked, you guys would be crucifying Wang for that. He put his money where his mouth was. Some contracts work out, others don't, that is sports. Steinbrenner had plenty of overspent\bad contracts too. Sather was ripped off by Gomez, Drury & Redden. He was very lucky to get 2 of them off his books. If he didn't Gaborik & Richards would not be Rangers today. Now, everyone praises the job Sather did. The DP contract is not holding the Isles back, they just have to move on without counting on him for anything.
James M.
9:59 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Yeah just do a google search and you'll find the laughter from 2006 to today regarding this contract. Who cares what the Rangers or Yankees did? They are not asking Nassau County for a new arena. I never said it was holding the Islanders back just an example of the mismanagement of the Islanders under Wang. He even fired Neil Smith who constructed the 1994 Rangers after a month. Why because he wouldn't do this contract? If that is the case, Neil Smith is a genius.
Mac
10:17 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James pleae look up your facts! If DP was signed to a 15 year contract on Sept 15 2006 and Neil Smith was hired on June 8 2006 then left within a month how did the DP signing impact it. From what I remember and looked up it was a dispute that trickled down management and how they were going to run the team. The decisions were being spread out to include to many people. It was at that time Pat Lafontaine also stepped down. Then please find me ANY owner or GM who always made the right choice and NEVER had a big signing go bad. It is the rick you take.
James M.
12:08 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Neil Smith was fired and not a month later Snow is the GM and signing DP to a 15 yr contract. It's pretty obvious there is some connection between the two. Pat also got out of there when he saw what was happening. Wang himself pushed for this deal.
"You have to have a commitment to who you're working with," said Wang, who made billions as a software developer.
"I've done this all my business career. Now I'm doing it in sports and everybody is like, 'Oh my God. How could he do that?'"
He's right; pretty much everybody is like that. The Globe and Mail headline the next morning accused Wang of "Long Island Lunacy," while one unnamed NHL executive called the Islanders' owner "insane."
Readers canvassed by CBC.ca almost universally said "what the…?" when asked their opinion on the deal.
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/columns/newsmakers/charles-wang.html
Again I feel the NO vote was based solely on Wang and not on the Coliseum or the Islanders.
Simba
2:44 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
I've been a loyal Islander fan since the days I played roller hockey in the bronx school yards wearing my Potvin jersey amoung the sea of Ranger jerseys. You could field an All Star team with the talent this team let go. I've been disgusted by Wang's greed. If he wanted a new arena, there are plenty of locations he could of tried. Potvin jersey is in a bin, laid to rest.
Mac
4:32 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Can you give us a list of these all star players the Islanders let go?
Business Man
11:44 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Google search on several occasions states "after 2 succesful years, Dipietro was given a 15 yr. contract". Now, we can both disagree with that statement, but this was the perception of many at the time. All the negative statements about the contract seem to be from 2009 forward, not from 2006, when the contract was signed.
Now, those type of long term deals are more & more prevelant.
By that point in time, the injuries had become a major issue.
And the Ranger & Yankee comparision is this:
-When they have many bad signings, it is still perceived as ok, because you still can be succesful despite these contracts
-When Wang has 1 bad contract (really 2, with Yashin, in fairness), everyone jumps all over it.
And, if the contract "is not holding the team back", as you state, then what is your point? He gave away 1 bad contract, we all agree to that. It has not prevented the team from success. We agree to that.
James M.
12:18 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Bad signing do not hold a team back. I agree. My point is and was that Nassau is not going to support Wang because
A. He threatened to pull the team if he doesn't get his way. This is NY we don't deal well with threats of any kind. We would gladly shoot ourselves in the foot so Wang loses.
B. In a Recession, no one likes a Billionaire asking for a handout from the public. If the Islanders had asked for the handout again Nassau residents may have complied but Wang and Mangano asking for it after the Lighthouse Project was killed left a bad taste in everyone's mouth.
C. There were no contracts settled before the vote. Everything was still "yeah Wang said they are going to do this and this. The details will be worked out after the vote". Do you buy a car without knowing how much it'll cost? Do you hand a contractor $40K and tell him to build an addition without a contract or defined details? NO.
Don't blame anyone but Murray, Mangano and Wang for the fall of the Coliseum because all roads lead to their decisions.
Mac
12:34 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James: Wang didnt threaten to leave if he didnt get his way. he made a statement saying this is no longer a viable arena for his club and his investment which he has every right to do. Thsi has nothign to do with getting his way but the reality of continuing to lose money EVERY year. B: WANG did NOT ask for a handout. this is a common misconception. Wang was prepared to pay for thsi privately and it was denied. This was the county they refuse to sell the property and want to control what goes their. If the county offered to sell the land and arena then Wang griped so be it. He tried to buy it they said NO. C; thos e contracts should have been completed for all to see. But once again this falls on the county. How did the COUNTY have the nerve to ask us to vote on something that wasnt complete. It shouldve been up to the county to see it to its completion before a vote. Instead we got a very underhanded shady election in August.
Wang did nothing wrong. he is trying to make more money. isnt this what a successful businessman does. The county shouldve worked with him to get this doen instead of asking us. remember the "handout" would not have lead to Wang owning the building or the property. he still would have been the tenant paying rent every month.
ROBERT
3:38 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Interested bystander I've tried explaining a fraction of the work that's done by Police Officers in the Pct's . There's so much you can write in the comment section. Like you said you've never been in a pct and you really have no clue on the work that is done in them. I think if you had more knowledge on police work , you would feel differently about closing 4 of Nassau's 8 pcts. Looks like we're going around in circles disagreeing with the closing of the Pct's. I believe the 8 Pct's in Nassau County are needed . Each pct covers a certain area and these Pct's handle all the problems of these areas. Closing the Pct's increases work loads of the remaining Pct's . Less pcts and less staff will effect how NCPD handles crime . Like I said many jobs that could be civilianized have been already. I think we've argued the point enough . We'll have to see how the County Legislator votes on this topic.
James M.
3:59 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Unless there is some kind of Republican uprising in the Legislature they are going to pass the Republican plan.
My Swami prediction is 11-8 in favor of the restructuring
ROBERT
4:51 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Interesting how this all came to light after elections .
James M.
5:43 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Of course. Do you want a politician to torpedo his reelection campaign by being honest?
Mac
5:55 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
James the comptrollers report doesnt exactly say we will be fine without the islanders. this is what it say "...the County could retain revenue from the Coliseum in the absence of the Islanders." Could is an awfully big word in this sentence. I will point out to you that there is only one other arena this size in the US that does not have a primary tenant and it is less than 5 years old. It has a pro lax team, indoor soccer, concerts on a very regular basis of TOP liners, hosts NCAA games and is the primary site for a d1 hockey league. Now I will tell you it is having difficulty maintaining itself. They are in pursuit of an NHL franchise. You can look it up it is in KC. The NVMC would have a likely close without these things. If the primary temant leaves and isnt replaced it will be a tough to keep open. Also the lease is so poor that other tenants shy away. The powers in NC gave away much of the vending rights also. Forget the Islanders the politicians need to get together and figure this out because the revenue lost if the building closes will bemade up in our taxes.
Business Man
9:23 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mac is exactly correct. Without a main tenant and 4 other major indoor arenas in the area, the Coliseum would quickly deteriorate and close. To suggest otherwise, is contrary to any other arena situation in the country. In KC, that is the only arena within many miles. Here, there will be 4 other major arenas for any act to choose from.
James M.
10:06 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Here's the exact quote
"It should also be noted that in 2004/05, when no Islanders games were played because of the NHL lockout, the County’s total SMG revenues did not decline significantly. This would seem to indicate that the County is able to book other events in the absence of the Islanders and thereby retain the revenue."
I agree they have to keep it open, but instead of trying to build the next wonder of the world they should just build a new stadium and conference center like Indianapolis. One of the main reasons the Lighthouse project was killed was all the additional things Wang wanted to do. The Vote died because of Wang and not because of the Islanders.
Mac
10:13 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James once again that four letter word is "seem". How are they going to make up the 760k per year from Islander tickets alone. The money they get from SMG is very deceptive because most come from Islander games. What vote are you referring too? the August vote? Kate Murray opposed the Lighthouse because she is a republican and the democrats lead by Suozzi supported it. The same Republican Kate Murray supported the vote we had in August for the new arena while the democrats were opposed. You dont think this had anythng to do with it?
James M.
12:01 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Accountants try not to use absolutes for future considerations. I agree Murray's denial and support seems more tied to politics than changes to the plan. I am just aware from many of those that voted that it seemed like more of a referendum on Wang's management of the Islanders than about the Coliseum. I think if another company is put forth to manage and build on the property the same vote might have been a yes.
Mac
12:26 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
I agree about the fans of the Islanders myself included even though I do attend 20+ games a year that if they won on a consistent basis the fans would come. But in this case it isnt about the fans really because even if the building sold out every night under the current lease Wang would barely break even if that. Then the top tier free agents do not want to come here. Regarding Neil Smith, jsut a bad overall move to begin with. I dont know the whole story do you? What was the agreement between neil and Wang? being called an "insane" owner isnt such a bad thing is it? I think they called Steinbrenner and Cuban the same. Bottom line though this is about the building and if things dont change the Islanders will be gone and I whole heartedly believe the place will also be gone.
James M.
1:03 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
MAc My point which you keep glossing over is that it is about Wang. IF there is another group willing to develop the arena and everyone is willing to work with the new group you can claim politics (though Wang lost with a Democrat and Republican in charge) or you can easily say TOH and Nassau doesn't want to work with Wang in regards to the Coliseum.
I think Nassau residents are savvy enough to not trust Wang without a contract in place hence they voted no. Wang cannot move the Islanders without consent from the NHL and may be forced to sell. It has happened before and can and will happen again.
Being called insane is always a bad thing but those that make a success are considered geniuses and those that don't (Wang) are considered well insane. So far Wang has not proven any of his critics wrong.
THis is from NYTimes
"The conflict with Smith involved the lack of a traditional general manager’s role, Wang told reporters yesterday at Nassau Coliseum in Uniondale, N.Y. He was referring to his unconventional view that his team’s front office would be run by committee.
That was a philosophy that Smith ultimately could not work under."
Bottom Line the Lighthouse Project and the referendum vote were about Wang. Maybe with a new development group it will be about the building. THe Islanders will probably stay at the Coliseum whether it is under Wang or a new owner remains to be seen.
Mac
1:22 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James I am not glossing over anything this is NOT about Wang. What has he ever done to the people of nassau county. Yes Wang lost woth a republican and a democrat and dont you see then when aligned with rep dems blocked then when aligned with dens the republicans blocked it. This isnt a concern that are elected officlals backed Wang when there party was in power and against when it wasnt? I dont think we should trust ANYONE without a contract in place. But that falls on the county for presenting something for us to vote on that was incomplete, done in a rush and during a stand alone August vote during a reccesion. You are right the NHL needs to approve the move and bettman already stated he wants a team here but the Coliseum may no longer be able to sustain an NHL franchise. I heard him speak those words on WFAN. A new owner would never buy this team under this current lease in this old dilapitated outdated building. If the people of the county were dumb enough to vote NO because of Wang I live in a county of idiots. They voted no because it was a poorly timed, hastily put together plan done in August to try and be sneaky. the people of Nassau were not fooled by these tactics. AND if Wang persuaded Mangano and crew to go forward under these terms they are idiots and once again playing political games. Your quote from the times is what I said??? But dont you think Smith knew thisgoing in before accepting the job? Wang is losing boatlaods of money here and that is a fact.
James M.
2:42 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
No I don't think Smith knew what he was getting into and neither did Pat LaFontaine hence why they were fired and/or quit in such a short period of time. I've never actually seen the books of the Islanders and I know the NHL plays accounting games with TV rights and the concessions so I could not say for sure he is losing money and no one could. Wang has never opened his books to the public so all we have to go by are politicians and PR reports which are as useless as the paper they are printed on. If the Islanders were in the playoffs every year, Wang would be making money but the team that is on the ice is incapable of winning more than 50% of their games and a lot of that is due to Wang's Management and a history of bad management of the Islanders. I won't go into the numerous instances of bad management of the team. There are websites dedicated to just that. Mac you are too quick to blame everyone else from the voters to the politicians when the factor common to all of these problems is Wang himself. I agree no buyer is going to buy the team as they are right now in the building they are right now. However I think the new development group which includes Blumenfeld has a much better chance of building something than Wang ever did. Wang should be concerned with putting a competitive product on the ice. He's had 10 years and failed at every step of developing a winning team.
James M.
3:03 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
http://www.fieldofschemes.com/news/archives/2011/06/4596_nassau_projecti.html
So the county would be paying to build an arena and handing over control of 77 acres of development rights to Islanders owner Charles Wang, and in return would get ... somewhere between a $12 million a year loss and a $2 million (and rising) a year profit, assuming you count as "profit" taxes that any development on the site, including the existing Nassau Coliseum, would be paying anyway.
Mac
4:46 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James of course Wang is the common thread he is the owner of the team. Also I agree one hundred percent for the county to build and give control would be moronic at best! I just do not think Wang deserves the blame. I firmly believe the politicians could've gotten it done.
Business Man
5:22 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
A stubborn, unwillingness to sit down and negotiate. That was the problem. Wang was willing to sit down and negotiate. That is fact. Whether or not he would have budged enough on the Lighthose to satisfy most? We will never know. The county approved the original Lighthouse. Fact. The private development was shot down by the TOH. Fact. Our Town Supervisior refused to sit down with the Wang\Rechler group & negotiate, claiming "conflict of interest" Fact.
My opinion, Wang was too easy not to call the town to task on this. This should have been front & center in the last election that Ms. Murray won by another Landslide. If people realized that the town board was why the process was stopped, perhaps the election might have been much closer. Force her to the negotiating table.
Lloyd
5:31 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
James M.....I agree 100% with your posts.
It IS all about Wang and his credibility and reputation.
The public is not stupid or so forgiving.
The timing.of the Aug. Referendum was a sham and didnt fool the public either.
Wang has lost touch with the public and lost his ability to make deals with the politicians.
He plans and schemes for Mitcel Field were way too overbearing and expensive for the public to accept
And he must be a bastard to deal with. We can let Neil Smith testify to that.
Worst case scenario...Wang moves the Isles to Brooklyn and we lose an NHL team.
Best case...He sells the team to a legitimate deep pocketed and experienced sports group and they make a deal with the County to share the costs for a new building.
The other scenario is that Wang moves the Isles to KC and we lure back in here one of the many struggling NHL franchises to wait for the new arena to be built or have one ready for them.
Like you say, James...if Wang stays we get nothing done.
Mac
5:54 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Once agin Lloyd your ignorance shows. The politicians played Wang for their benefit to oppose each other. Suozzi said yes Murray said no then manganous said yes to a much worse deal for the taxpayer and the dema said no. Your common thread is dem vs rep. Wang didn't come up with the entire August fiasco. Some geniuses we voted for thought it was a great idea to scam us. When was the last election Wang called? What is so hard to understand that the county does not want to share that property. They have clearly stated many times they will not sell it or give up any right.. Any owner would be crazy to deal with these guys as the deficit continues to grow. Who are we luring back to the coliseum ? If we built a new arena the isles would stay. A team would never come back here especially after we have shown just how little the isles mean to us.
Lloyd
10:44 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Mac, you are wrong. I can name at least 4 NHL cities that teams deserted and then new ones were lured back.
Ok. Let' s go.
Atlanta
Winnepeg
Minnesota
Colorado
And I may have missed some.
Teams come and go in the NHL like the coaches on the Devils and Islanders draft picks.
Long Island is a very lucrative market for a wealthy and hockey savvy owner.
Somebody else will swoop on in the minute the Islanders are out the door.
And if you think I am ignorant, then you are pig headed. You refuse to put the blame squarely on whom it belongs. Your loyalty is nauseating.
And to be fair...I dont blame Wang for the summertime referendum. That nonsense was Manganos idea. But Wang stood up there defiant after his devastating defeat like he was in cahoots with Mangano and took it personally.
In the meantime, I see plenty of commercials for upcoming shows and events at the "dangerous, outdated, and dilapidated" Nassau Coliseum. For every jerk--- promoter who backs out of booking the Coliseum, there doesnt appear to be a shortage of promoters who see dollar signs at that ancient arena....Except for Mac and his closetful of Islanders fans.
I tuned into the Islanders-Canadiens game tonight. Not only did they get blown away, no one was at the game to even witness it and help Wang meet rent and payroll.
Its sad. Very sad.
BTW...I also watched the Rangers comeback victory in front of a full house at 45 year old MSG. How do you explain that phenomenon?
Mac
6:27 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Ok mr ignorant also known as LLoyd please I beg you loook up your facts. Since 1917 whcih is 95 years there have been 3 teams that have relocated back to a location that once had hockey Ottowa, Colorado and Atlanta then two cities were awarded expansion teams that once had hockey Minny and ATL. You can correct me if I am wrong. So at most 5 teams in 95 years is not a common at all. LI is such a lucrative market that in your own words the coliseum was less than full and the county wouldnt support a new arena. A savy owner wouldnt get involved with this mess until an arena would be built. Wang did nothing wrong in trying to get a new arena and own the land. The politicians should have made a bi-partisan attempt to get this done. But you live in NC that just doesnt happen. Yes there are shows at the coliseum and there will be as long as it is open. Take a look at the percentage of open dates vs teh Rock or in Philly. Really cant compare MSG because they have two pro teams. Then last night I was at the game and yes it wsnt full but it was a good sized crowd. MTL always brings fans. Then I guess a 4-2 game with an empty net goal by MTL was a blowout where the shots on goal where in the Isles favor. It was actually a very good game the Rangers are consistent sell outs in Manhattan the most famous arena in sports. Ranger fans support their team as does the city. People who live in the county do not.