As budget belts tighten all over New York, Long Island's school districts face difficult choices that could affect students for years to come. As the district grapples with escalating pension and benefits costs, along with the need for certain capital improvements including a leaky roof at Weber Middle School, Port Washington has to make those tough decisions
Voters will do just that on Tuesday, May 17, less than one month away. That’s when the 2011-12 Port Washington School District school budget goes before the public. At that time voters will also elect two school board members.
The budget calls for $130,861,023 in spending, a 2.96 increase over the current budget. School officials said the tax levy would increase by about 3.95 percent.
There are two positions on the school board up for election. Incumbent Willilam Hohauser and Alan Baer put in petitions and are running unopposed.
District finds savings
After weeks of meetings, during which the school officials spoke of “shared sacrifice,” the Board unanimously adopted a plan that calls for 2.5 fewer librarians and 2.5 fewer guidance counselors, saving the district $497,090.
The district is also saving an additional $470,000 staggering the school bus schedule. School Superintendent Dr. Geoffrey Gordon had hoped to bring an additional savings of as much as $1.5 million to the district by convincing New York State to repeal a mandate “regarding required seats for ridership even when students walk, drive or are driven to school.” In March, the district surveyed parents, one-third of which said they would opt out of district transportation. However, for now, busing remains another state mandate.
The district is also finding savings through retirement and attrition, the positions including a middle school health teacher, a high school English teacher, and a high school psychologist.
Additional savings come from $1,000 donations from administrators, though the teachers union opted not to give back the $1,500 recommended by the district.
Community feedback
Residents spoke about the impact the budget would have on the community.
Referring to the loss of school psychologist and quoting a local counseling center, Jennifer Heinlein said, “If my kid isn’t well, your kid isn’t safe.” She is concerned about a potential increase in case loads, saying, “That’s when kids fall through the cracks.”
Doug Augenthaler believes the board should stop addressing the budget on a year-to-year basis. He likened the 2011-12 budget to “kicking the can” down the road.
At the April 12 school board meeting, he said, “You really need to think about the long-term structural problems that this district faces, and face them head on.”
Bert Tobin
9:50 am on Friday, April 22, 2011
NY State publishes the salaries of every teacher in every school district. With this increase, the midpoint salary for the ~450 teachers in Port is $106,000 a year. When benefits are added, the total rises to $140,000.... all for 180 days of work a year..
Many of the teachers are our friends and neighbors and must be aware of the economic pain others are experiencing. Many of our Port residents have either lost their jobs, or are working at lesser jobs or taken pay freezes or pay cuts and are thankful they still have a job.
All the community is asking is that our teachers freeze their salaries at 2010 levels for this year which will save almost $2.7 million of the $3.7 million budget increase. No programs are cut and no teachers need lose their jobs. If we are to share the sacrifice, this seems to be a win-win for all parties.
Bert Tobin
10:03 am on Friday, April 22, 2011
For those who want to validate the salaries paid in Port to our school professionals, you can check the following website.
http://www.seethroughny.net/PayrollsPensions/tabid/55/Payrolls/StatePayroll/tabid/69/Default.aspx?BRANCHID=6
hank ratner
2:45 pm on Friday, April 22, 2011
In my opinion, the teachers and their union showed their TRUE COLORS when they had the opportunity to SAVE JOBS and NOT HURT the kids, by agreeing to a ONE TIME giveback. They REFUSED! Shame on them. " Shared Sacrifice" is a one-way street with the taxpayers asked to dig deeper.
Sean Hassett
10:33 pm on Friday, April 22, 2011
It is not a true statement to say "all for 180 days of work a year". Teachers bring work home and have to correct homework, tests and labs for many hours after they get home and again on weekends. During summer vacation, they are expected to take courses at their own expense. They come in extra early on some mornings and stay late some evenings to offer extra help to students who are struggling. They do not get paid overtime. Often they buy supplies out of their own pocket. Teachers may have fewer days when they report to their official place of work than other professions, but they probably put in more total hours than many others. Their time is simply more concentrated. When you compare their pay with other professions where people have similar advanced degrees and professional qualifications, we're getting a pretty good deal.
What we really need to look at is the number of administrators in our school district. They are much more highly paid than teachers and are not directly involved in what we in the private sector would call "production of the product". I do not have the numbers to hand, but I remember when I first learned the numbers that they seemed pretty high for the size of the district. Why do we have so many highly paid administrators?
Joseph Mirzoeff
12:09 pm on Saturday, April 23, 2011
In our high school teachers teach class three hours and twenty minutes per day. The other part of their six and a half hour day has responsibilities but is somewhat flexible and has little oversight. English and history (10% of our teachers) teachers may take their work home, but the rest should have no need to, if they are managing their day well. Roslyn (a district that in my opinion is managed better than ours) has cable in the teachers lounge.
You may not know that our average teacher compensation package is $140,000 (base + benefits) for a 1200 hour year -- normal annual employment is 1800 hours. Students also lose about 100 hours of the 1200 hours to teacher absenteeism, snow days, or part days missing that isn't made up. This loss is much higher than the wider workforce and is an objective measure, in my opinion, of the unit and the system's lack of dedication. While my children had many wonderful, dedicated, capable teachers, who I think the world of, the numbers tell me that there are also many teachers who do not belong here. Unfortunately, we treat them all the same.