patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Port Resident Complains About Superintendent Raises at Board Meeting

One man in particular lets his voice be heard loud and clear Tuesday night.

 

The Port Washington Board of Education meeting lasted three hours Tuesday night in the Schreiber High School auditorium, and residents wanting to be heard waited for an opportunity to speak.

Resident Hank Ratner claimed he hadn't heard the board open community comments earlier. He was irate about approved raises for the three assistant superintendents.

“I’d like to poll the board, beginning with seat number one,” Ratner said. “Seat number one, did you vote yes or no on the raises for the three assistant superintendents?”

No answer.

“Seat number two, did you vote yes or no on the raises for the three assistant superintendents?" Ratner asked again, with no answer.

This continued on down the line of the six seated board members — none of whom answered. President Karen Sloan informed Ratner, “Sir, just to reiterate, this is a time for community comments, not a discussion or polling session of the board.”

But Ratner continued, “Let me add that I do not intend one bit to demean the assistant superintendents…I think they’re fine people and employees, but I will tell you that I personally find it unconscionable that I come to meetings and I hear you telling us that we’re facing horrific budget problems and that we might have to look to cut 30 to 40 teachers and the programs, and yet you approve — I assume unanimously — raises to people who, again with all respect, who have gotten raises the past two or three years in a row.”  

He then said it was “outrageous” that the board never addresses his questions, and that he expects an e-mail reply.

Later in the meeting, Superintendent Geoffrey Gordon addressed Ratner's complaint indirectly by saying, “I will say this to anyone who listens, loud and clear, every non-alignment employee got a 2 percent raise last time and I have not responded to the vitriolic e-mails that have come to the board. Every one of the non-aligned employees, from the technical to the people who work with our computers who make $40,000 a year to the various people who make low salaries, to our assistant superintendents who work hard and do all kinds of expert things to save dollars for this community.

“For people to criticize the assistant superintendents — and I say this as a person who has taken no raise voluntarily and stand proud of that — that in this community, you people should be proud of the fact that we have a great faculty, we have great students, we have a terrific community and we have good people — even those who constructively criticize — but let’s make sure we understand what we have. This is a great school district and we’re going to get better.”

Later in the meeting Ratner returrned to the podium when the community comments period reopened.

Ratner began by saying that he and Gordon have a good personal relationship.

“I made no criticism of the superintendents; as a matter of fact I said that Dr. [Nicholas] Stirling, Dr. [Kathleen] Mooney and Mrs. [Mary] Callahan are doing a wonderful, exemplary job,” Ratner said. “And you talk about vitriol and criticism and I resent that and from man to man…I’ll give you an apology, but I want the record to say I didn’t criticize the superintendents, but I will criticize to the mountaintops the decision made by the school board.”

The next school board meetings will be on Nov. 13 at 8 p.m. at Schreiber High School and Nov. 15 at 8 p.m. at Weber Middle School.

Related Topics: Board of Education, Geoffrey Gordon, Hank Ratner, Karen Sloan, and Schreiber High School

Joseph Mirzoeff

11:38 am on Thursday, November 3, 2011

I FOILed the 15 raises in question. The lowest base pay on the list was $55,000. Unless this employee is atypical he also gets a benefits package worth more than $25,000 per year. To characterize this as $40,000 is, in my opinion, typical of the misdirection that has occurred for many years in the Boardroom and is, in my opinion, a source of our problems. The three asst. superintendents of our schools, who just got raises, each get paid more than the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Controller of NYState. The Governor, Controller, and Attorney General of NY, by contrast, took 5% pay cuts this year, trying to set an example for the State. Our Superintendent of Schools gets paid almost twice as much as the Governor recommended as a maximum for the job in February this year.

Reply

Richard Brody

12:09 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011

An objective observer of the fiscal aspect of our Schools would have to agree there are non direct student areas w/potential savings.Our Admin&Operation expenses need closer examination,for an argument could be made that there are far too many levels, and too many higher salaries.In today's economy, defending certain costs as only a small%over last yr does not examine whether last year's expenditures were at the proper level.Although it was a nice gesture for the Superintendent to voluntarily forgo his increase,we must recognize that we are paying our Superintendent far more money than some substantial larger school districts pay.Let's address the #of Asst Principals in the HS,the extra exp of continuing the $color system in the Middle School, the impact of class length at Schreiber,etc.All we hear are the same old discussions about only a minimal increase,yet when the avg homeowner pays 5 figure amts just in school tax,a small increase is not so small an amt.All these increases are in addition to our present level of taxes.Mr. Ratner certainly had the right to ask his question how a Board member voted,because these are elected positions,&the public can ask any question about a vote&should expect an answer.Let's start full discussions w/out preconceived notions,examine all alternatives.Otherwise,we end up with the same old polarizing school budget election situations, which is unhealthy for this community. Let's work together in a spirit of transparency and full disclosure!

Reply

matteo

9:28 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

3 assistants!!! What a joke. We don't need the superintendant, let alone 3 assistants. The School Board should be the superintendant and work with the principals.

Let's stop this administrative nightmare and use the available moneys for the children. Education is about children, not the asst superintendants. We don't need the top heavy admin. staff, it's a total waste.

Reply

John D. Reckenhouser

9:44 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Gordon has been saying this for years now we will get better. Why in fact is it that the cost of education is so high in Port , yet each time a result report comes out we are NEVER in the highest of the L.I. School Districts. It's time for ONE Board of ED. for Nassau and it's time to get rid of all these asst's and asst's asst's and husbands, wives, uncle and aunts , cousins and cousins working for the school district. Maybe it's time for the state to come in and take a good hard look.

Reply

Nassau Taxpayer

9:49 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Sure, reject local control. Let Mineola dumb-down our district and the entire county to Wyandanch levels (and property values). What a maroon!

Reply

David

10:02 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Albany, NY (January 3, 2011)

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced that he will reduce his salary by five percent.

The salary for the Governor, $179,000, is set by state law and has not changed since 1999. The Governor will return to the State the amount his salary is reduced.

In addition, Lt. Governor Robert J. Duffy and newly hired senior members of the Cuomo Administration who are filling existing positions in the Executive Chamber are also taking salary reductions and have agreed to take a pay cut of 5 percent from their predecessors' salaries. This includes the Governor's Secretary, Counsel, Director of State Operations, Counselor and the Chief of Staff.

Governor Cuomo also directed that the budget for the Executive Chamber be reduced by five percent.

“Change starts at the top and we will lead by example,” Governor Cuomo said. “Families and business owners in every corner of the state have learned to do more with less in order to live within their means and government must do the same.”

The Secretary to the Governor has initiated a review of all Executive Chamber expenses to determine where the reductions will be made.

Carol Kellermann, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, said, “The Governor’s announcement of cuts in the Executive Chamber budget, including cuts to his own salary, demonstrate that sacrifices will be necessary in all aspects of State government if New York is to regain its fiscal health.”

Could we reduce $600k ? sure.

Reply

Laura Montllor, Architect

10:03 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

I can not understand why there would be ANY raises at ALL within the whole school system. Why are we raising the pay of administrators, any administrator while cutting teachers who are actually doing the work? Bad news for all OUR KIDS!

Reply

hank ratner

11:19 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Love to see some of you people come to a school board meeting and speak up! The next meeting is Nov. 15th @ PM at Schreiber.
See you there??

Reply

Ben

3:00 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

For what it cost to become a teacher these are the employees who should be paid well.

Each of these administrators has a nice salary they make plenty of money in these hard economic times they could have followed Dr. Gordon and passed on a raise but the Assistant Superintendents did NOT they took the money.

The problem with this district are ALL of the "little jobs" that get a salary and full benefits for the entire family. A large number of these employees, Education Assistants, Teacher Assistants, are a load of *RAP. The Civil Service secretaries make over $50K plus benefits.

Ask most any TA, or EA what is best about the job: "I get to leave at 310pm, and I get the Summer off, and the job is easy" Most of these employees are female mothers who have families the hours are great. Many are married to self-employed men, i.e. lawyers and the benefits are valuable to them. These small salarys with full benefits create a BIG expense for our community.

Take a look at the parking lots in our school district and see dozens of expensive high end cars everyone here is living well off a their piece of the pie and thats a fact.

As far as these Superintendents taking raises in hard economic they are laughing all the way to the bank.

Take a paycheck away from our teachers, adminstrators, TA's, EA's, etc. and see how fast these people leave.

So many are making a nice living off the PW school system this place is a cash cow I see it all most everyday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nassau Taxpayer

3:32 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

I think you'll find that many if not most of those "dozens of expensive high end cars in district parking lots" are gifted to students by wealthy district parents -- not driven by staff and administrators. Wretched excess of another type altogether!

Comment_arrow

Viking41

10:21 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011

Ben - did any of your teachers teach you about how to use periods when writing? A sentence expresses a complete thought and contains a subject and a verb. Just an FYI.

hank ratner

7:36 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

Next school board meeting November 15th @ Schreiber 8PM !!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

hank ratner

7:36 pm on Sunday, November 6, 2011

Next school board meeting November 15th @ Schreiber 8PM !!!!!!!!!!!!
Show up, speak up !!!!

Reply

Leave a comment