.
Feedback

Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants Can Damage Tissue, FDA Says

Talk to your doctor if you've had a hip replacement; Metal-on-metal hip implants are known to fail early and more often than other types of implants.

When metal-on-metal hip implants were introduced, they were marketed at being a superior type of hip replacement. Consumers were told that, compared to the older metal-on-plastic and metal-on-ceramic implants, all-metal hip implants were more durable and less likely to dislocate, making it a better option for younger, more active patients. Within recent years, however, researchers have found that all-metal hip implants have a serious flaw; the device releases tiny metal particles when the surfaces of the implant rub together, such as when the patient walks or runs. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued new guidelines for patients implanted with these devices, advising them to speak with their doctor if they experience symptoms such as pain or swelling.

What is a Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant?

A metal-on-metal hip implant is an implant made of all metal components. A hip replacement consists of a cup, which acts as the hip socket, and a long stem with a ball on top acting as the femur (thighbone). These components interact with each other to mimic the natural motion of the hip. With a metal-on-metal hip implant, both of these components are made of metal. The problem is that sometimes when the patient walks or runs, these surfaces grind against each other and release metal ions into the body.

Metal-on-metal hip implants gained notoriety in 2010, after Johnson & Johnson recalled 93,000 DePuy ASR hip implants worldwide. The recall was based on data showing that the hips failed in 13 percent of patients within five years. A typical hip implant is expected to last up to 15 years.

FDA Looking for Stricter Regulations, Metal Hips Never Tested

After Johnson & Johnson recalled the DePuy ASR, researchers found that the problems were common to all types of metal-on-metal hip implants. In light of this, the FDA asked a number of manufacturers to conduct post market studies to find out whether they release dangerous amounts of metal ions.

Believe it or not, metal-on-metal hip implants were never tested for safety before they were released onto the market. Because of a regulatory loophole known as the 510(k) route, manufacturers are allowed to sell these devices without any clinical testing as long as they can prove that it is similar enough to a previously approved device, even if that previous device had poor clinical performance or is no longer in use. The 510(k) was supposed to only be a temporary route for metal hips, but the FDA never got around to finalizing regulations. In light of all the issues that have come up, the agency is now trying to close the loophole by requiring manufacturers to prove that metal hip implants are safe and effective.

The FDA has also issued new guidelines for patients with metal-on-metal hips. In a Safety Communication issued last week, the agency warned about the risk of “adverse local tissue reaction”, which is what can occur when the metallic debris from the device gets absorbed into the muscle and tissues surrounding the implant. For the first time, the FDA recommended metal ion testing for patients experiencing symptoms such as pain, swelling, limited mobility or sounds coming from the hip (clicking, popping, squeaking). Even if patients do not have symptoms, they are still advised to talk with their doctors and have regular physical examinations. Diagnostic imaging such as CT scans and MRIs are also recommended for assessing the tissues surrounding the hip implant.  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Washington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
George Mulligan May 23, 2013 at 07:12 pm
I hope the closing is only temporary. I purchased milk and other items from Dairy Barn for manyRead More years. Always got good quality products. Never had a problem.
Nassau Taxpayer May 23, 2013 at 03:55 pm
With the loss of "D-Barn", the lack of a drive-through convenience store creates a voidRead More worth filling.
George Mulligan May 23, 2013 at 07:19 pm
There was very little publicity about the budget this year. I was disappointed that the increase wasRead More over 3.5 percent. We still haven't addressed the salary issues and maybe we never will. Until the salary and benefit package is decreased, there will never be a reduction in the cost of education in Port Washinton.
NYB May 23, 2013 at 03:33 pm
What does it matter? No matter what you do, the budget increase will pass. Just empty your pocketsRead More and move on.
Nassau Taxpayer May 23, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Historically, that was a problem with "NO" voters...
Jason May 23, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Judi Bosworth is coming down the Tracks!!!! "ALL ABOARD"
Nassau Taxpayer May 23, 2013 at 12:50 pm
There's a lot "Dina" doesn't know -- or sure acts like it, and an obvious and growingRead More amount she wishes the electorate didn't know about her failure to perform for PW.
HazyDavy May 23, 2013 at 11:13 am
if we are going to sell off our 40 spot lot why not advocate for the LIRR to chip in and helpRead More building the 2 or 3 story parking lot on Haven? with more trains and more population we need more parking. we are fooling ourselves that this is not a "Hicksville" type train station. we are a main hub and it needs a substantial parking lot that will help commuter parking and help retail parking in the main lots off of main street. anyone who does not want that parking lot built needs to really ask themselves why not. if we can build a new car wash on a main cut through street for no reason we can get this done with the same traffic nightmares!!! BTW during construction which im sure will take at least a year. where will those people park? in the other lots, so us who take the 808 train will get screwed bc we will not have a place to park now.
Nassau Taxpayer May 23, 2013 at 12:52 pm
Good spot for a multi-story municipal/LIRR garage, given the height of terrain behind it.
Bob May 20, 2013 at 06:28 pm
I agree. This lot should be open all the time. Maybe there is a potential liability issue butRead More let's see if it can be worked out.
hank ratner May 17, 2013 at 01:37 pm
A 135 million dollar budget with another 5 million+ assured for next year, teachers have to buyRead More "school supplies" in Port Washington? Are you kidding?